The Catholic University of America

CUA Law Professor Megan M. La Belle won the 2016 Southeastern Association of Law Schools (SEALS) Call for Papers Award for her paper, "Public Enforcement of Patent Law." See below. See below. 
 

Professor La Belle won the 2016 Southeastern Association of Law Schools (SEALS) Call for Papers Award for her paper, "Public Enforcement of Patent Law," which is forthcoming in the Boston University Law Review. Professor La Belle presented her paper at the Call for Papers Luncheon on August 4 held during the SEALS Annual Conference August 3 – 9. To learn more about SEALS and the conference click here.
 

 

Public Enforcement of Patent Law

Megan M. La Belle
Catholic University of America (CUA) - Columbus School of Law
September 28, 2015

CUA Columbus School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2666835

Abstract:
Law enforcement in the modern regulatory state is largely a joint enterprise. In areas such as securities, antitrust, civil rights, and environmental law, enforcement responsibilities are allocated between public and private actors. Patent law, on the other hand, is enforced almost exclusively through private lawsuits. Considering patent law’s constitutionally-mandated public purpose — “to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts” — this privatization of patent enforcement is troubling.

In recent years, there has been some movement away from this purely private enforcement regime for patent law. The Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission, for example, have involved themselves in certain patent matters that implicate antitrust law. While heading in the right direction, these regulators alone cannot adequately enforce patent law due to their limited jurisdiction, resources, and expertise.

This Article thus proposes a more robust public enforcement mechanism for patent law. It argues that Congress should arm the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO), the agency responsible for reviewing patents ex ante, with broad powers to police patent validity ex post. The PTO is best situated to lead this effort because of the agency’s expertise, institutional resources, and enhanced powers under the America Invents Act. Moreover, charging the PTO with the responsibility for policing patents should serve to dispel allegations of agency capture and institutional bias toward patent owners.

Click here to view the full article.

Lisa Lerman  

Professor Megan M. La Belle's
Areas of Expertise

Intellectual Property

Civil Procedure

Federal Courts


For additional information about our professors' areas of speciality, see the Catholic University Experts page.